The Court first looked to the language of the insurance policy itself, which established Farm Bureau’s responsibility to pay, and concluded that the policy language plainly indicated that Farm Bureau coverage was primary. The policy included language acknowledging that, as a matter of law, the parties could only contract for a policy which makes Medicare the secondary payer. The Court then turned to the MSPA and, finding the statutory language to be clear, held that a private cause of action exists that allows individuals to file suit against a primary payer for funds improperly paid by Medicare and double damages may be recovered.
We will continue to follow this case and will keep you informed of any developments as the parties proceed and litigate their case. **Updated to add: We do expect this case to proceed to federal court, as a state court should not have subject matter jurisdiction over claims arising under the MSPA.
No comments:
Post a Comment